Fanny and Alexander
Against the backdrop of early 20th-century Sweden, Ingmar Bergman’s sprawling and semi-autobiographical final major film follows the lives of two siblings as they navigate the kaleidoscope of family dynamics, the allure of the stage and the intricate psychologies of childhood. The film would win the Best Foreign Language Film award at the 1984 Academy Awards, along with three other awards. A grand yet intricately-observed film, Fanny and Alexander is a contemporary masterpiece, glorious and tragic in its pursuit of perfection.
As with Bergman’s other work, Fanny and Alexander focuses on the depths of the human psyche, childhood experience, and the shackles of oppression. In their idyllic hometown, Fanny and Alexander Ekdhal meander through the corridors of their bourgeois home, exploring blooming gardens, partaking in local festivities, and bearing witness to the metamorphosis of their family members. The film's lavish production and costume design owe their splendour to the Finnish film producer Jörn Donner, who insisted on sourcing exclusively from Bergman's native country – a decision initially met with skepticism by the director himself. Yet the sanctuary of love and tenderness represented by the household is tragically shattered when the patriarch Oscar dies.
The hypocrisy of religion is embodied in Oscar’s austere replacement Bishop Edvard, whom Emilie turns to in her moments of sorrow. Upon his arrival, it is as if the air has been sucked out of the film, the high-spirited if cheeky Alexander worn down by Vergers’ excessive punishments and petty obsession with reputation. In one scene Emilie finds herself momentarily caught in a moment of laughter while Edvard asserts his increasingly despotic control by pressing his arm and face against hers captures the transformed reality, and claustrophobic domesticity, of the children’s lives. Amidst this tableaux, Alexander sits bewildered, confronted with a new and unfamiliar image of his father.
Much of the world of Fanny and Alexander is viewed through the eyes of a child, in which the boundaries between reality and fiction are less clearly delineated. As Alexander’s abuse gets more severe, Emilie’s characterisation becomes blurrier. Is she a vulnerable woman being taking advantage of by a nefarious patriarchy, or is she an enabler of her son’s pain? Soon, unusual mystical blips start to be woven into the narrative. Isak Jacobi, a family friend of the Ekdahls, attempts to smuggle the grandchildren out of the bishop's house by hiding them in a trunk. When the bishop discovers their absence and searches for them, the children mysteriously appear in their room. At the Jacobi residence, the children meet Isak's nephews, Aron and Ismael. Alexander, while disoriented one night, has a conversation he believes to be with God, only to discover it's a puppet manipulated by Aron. Bergman uses magical realism not just to induce a childlike perspective, but as autobiographical mechanism. Many of the characters in the film resemble players from Bergman’s earlier films, as if Bergman is reckoning with the ghosts of his own life.
In a production that featured a staggering 1,200 extras and boasts a runtime of over three hours (with an extended version lasting just over five hours), it is difficult to even gesture towards the entirety of the film’s emotional world: Fanny and Alexander is its own freewheeling cinematic universe. The viewer has the perhaps disconcerting feeling that one is looking not only into a film but a life: Bergman’s swan song, and his final testament to the power of fantasy to describe experience, and cinema to make it live.
YOU'VE HIT THE WALL.
YOU'VE READ YOUR LAST COMPLIMENTARY ARTICLE.
More text here
More text here